In such a context, opposing to the stem cells research is similar to opposing to the research of the outer space and solar system in the Middle Ages. What is meant here is the fact that it is impossible to stop the progress.
Moreover, attempts to stop the progress, including the ban of the stem cells research, can be harmful because, in such a way, the progress of the modern medicine and genetics will be postponed. Therefore, instead of the better understanding of the subject and its essence and using its full potential, scientists will view the stem cells research as a taboo. At this point, it is possible to refer to numerous benefits the stem cells research can bring to the science, medicine and mankind at large.
In fact, the stem cells research can contribute to the efficient treatment of terminally ill patients Duin, For instance, today, health care professionals can save lives of patients who would have died without findings made in the result of the stem cells research. In addition, the stem cells research open larger opportunities for transplantation that will save lives of many patients and help them to return to the normal life.
Thus, any attempts to ban the stem cells research lead to the retardation of the development of medicine. In contrast, the in-depth research of stem cells will lead to the better understanding of the subject that will help to overcome ethically arguable issues since the better scientists know the subject of the research the less is the risk of unethical behavior of researchers.
Stem cell research refers to scientific research on elements within the human body known as stem cells for the purposes of achieving medical breakthroughs. This is a quite controversial issue in these times, with different groups of people holding radically different ideas about how the issue must be handled. This essay will focus on four main points:. The issue of stem cell research has always been closely connected with the issue of abortion.
This is because, as Robertson has indicated, human embryos consist of one of the most potent sources of stem cells, and the extraction of stem cells from the embryos requires the destruction of the embryos.
This destruction, then, is what both abortion and embryonic stem cell research have in common. According to the argument against stem cell research, the embryo is a fully living human being; therefore, the destruction of embryos for the purposes of scientific research would be completely unacceptable.
Moreover, this would especially be the case in the event that embryos were manufactured specifically for the purposes of stem cell research—that is, with the explicit intention of destroying them. Insofar as it is accepted that the embryo is a human life, the implications necessarily follow: The problem with stem cell research, then, would be that insofar as it relies on embryonic stem cells, it either implicitly or explicitly provides an incentive for murder.
The objection could perhaps be raised that the harm done to an embryo by stem cell research would be outweighed by the potential good to humanity that would result in terms of the alleviation of suffering. However, there are two main reasons why this objection could be identified as invalid.
The first pertains to what has been called the moral doctrine of double effect, which stipulates that it is never acceptable to utilize a morally unacceptable action as a means toward achieving a moral end, no matter how good that end may be.
Pro-life supporters argue the destruction of the embryo would be morally unacceptable, and it would thus not be acceptable to use it as a means toward the alleviation of suffering. Secondly, it must be remembered that within the context of the argument under consideration, the embryo is in fact conceptualized as an actual human being. Insofar as this is the case, then the same objections could be raised against destroying embryos in order to alleviate the suffering that could be raised against murdering one group of people in order to alleviate the suffering of another group of people.
It is unclear whether the embryo is an actual human being. However, it can at least be acknowledged that insofar as some starting point for life must be identified, conception does not seem to be an especially bad one. This is for the conceptual reason that the distinction between life and non-life must be a qualitative one; and whereas every distinction between fetal stages after conception is merely quantitative or a difference of degree and not of kind , the moment of conception itself could be understood as a qualitative jump.
Moreover, as Percy has observed, "it is commonplace in biology. The idea that the embryo is a living human being is thus at the very least fully defensible on rational grounds; and at any rate, it cannot be categorically dismissed on purely rational grounds. Another element of the argument against stem cell research pertains to the problem of playing God. Stem cell research is one of the most controversial topics of our day.
As you think about writing a persuasive essay, consider the importance of this topic and how emotive it can be to discuss both the arguments for and against. Any embryonic stem cell research essay needs to carefully weigh up the pros and cons, as well as the ethics involved. In a lot of ways, where you fall on stem cell research will be indicative of what you think about many different topics such as when you feel life begins, the justice and morality of using human cells to cure diseases, and how you interpret your own religious beliefs.
Begin your introduction with a hook that captures your reader and sets expectations for who you want your audience to ideally be. Do you want to persuade people who might be misinformed on the subject, or do you want to sway people to your side with an emotive anecdote?
Then go on to set up your thesis statement, which is the single most important sentence in a persuasive essay, and the foundation of everything you will be writing.
Stem Cell Research Controversy: An Argumentative Essay Stem Cell Research Controversy: An Argumentative Essay Introduction Few topics in science and religion have been as hotly contested in recent years as stem cell research, largely because it involves the fate of, disposition of, and research on the human embryo.
For these reasons they regard Embryonic Stem Cell Research as a modern day “Pandora’s box” and believe that it is better kept “shut”. The “moral status” of an embryo is the centre of the Embryonic Stem Cell Research ethical 5/5(1).
Embryonic Stem Cell Research Argumentative Essay Embryonic stem cell research is a highly debated and sensitive topic. Such good can come from researching this technology because many people would benefit from it. Stem cell research is one of the most controversial topics of our day. As you think about writing a persuasive essay, consider the importance of this topic and how emotive it can be to discuss both the arguments for and against. Any embryonic stem cell research essay needs to carefully weigh up the pros and cons, as well as the ethics involved.
Stem cell research and cloning are controversial. Scientists claim medical necessity. Opponents argue it's unethical. This sample expository essay explores the argument against stem cell research.. Arguments against stem cell research and cloning/5(5). Stem cell research has been a highly debated topic in our society this year. A variety of social, political, ethical and religious viewpoints have been brought to our attention. Many religious groups believe stem cell research is a violation of human rights. When Pope John Paul II addressed /5(13).